Start a 14-day trial
Compare

Picked by creators who outgrew Time Machine.

If you landed here, you're shopping. Good. Here's an honest comparison of macup against the tools you're considering — what each does well, and where it stops being enough.

Still not sure which fits you?

  • If you only need a local backup to one attached drive, Time Machine is fine. Keep it. Come back when you need cloud, deduplication, or multi-Mac visibility.
  • If you want unlimited single-Mac cloud for cheap, Backblaze Personal still has the strongest price-per-TB. macup wins when you need external-drive rotation, multi-Mac aggregation, ransomware-resistance by default, or a modern restore UX.
  • If you want a bootable clone of your Mac, use Carbon Copy Cloner for that specifically. macup handles ongoing versioned incremental backups — the two are complementary, not substitutes.
  • If you already use Arq and have it configured, the question is whether you want Mac-native UX, managed-cloud-as-a-first-class-option, and team/MSP features. If so, macup. If not, stay.
  • If you use SuperDuper or ChronoSync for scheduled clones, those are clone tools, not versioned backup. Keep them for their job; run macup alongside for continuous history and off-site copies.
  • If you want to compare any two tools side by side, use the compare picker — it generates every pairing in the set, not just macup-vs-X.

Start a trial and compare for yourself.

14-day trial. No card. Run macup alongside whatever you've got today.